Hi, Dshock336 here
Have you ever seen how some people grief a lot, and do it purposely, but only get 7 days? And have you ever seen someone make a one time accident and got thier first ban, but even after appealing still get 5 days? I think this is unfair. So, my suggestion is that higher members that are trusted, such as long time operators, admins and other very trusted people, should pick an odd amount of people, maybe 9 or 7 or something, who are all different, they do not do things the same, so there is variety. So the Point is, these people would form a kind of Jury, the person who banned them having a stronger effect on the "vote". This way, there will be more people to do a "checks and balances" type of system, and say, "Hey he didnt do anything that bad, he should get less", or "Hey she griefed a lot, lets give her a lengthier ban". If you like the idea, feel free to customize it, to make it work better for this server. Whether it is a good or bad idea, thanks for taking time to read my whole post
.
Thanks
Have you ever seen how some people grief a lot, and do it purposely, but only get 7 days? And have you ever seen someone make a one time accident and got thier first ban, but even after appealing still get 5 days? I think this is unfair. So, my suggestion is that higher members that are trusted, such as long time operators, admins and other very trusted people, should pick an odd amount of people, maybe 9 or 7 or something, who are all different, they do not do things the same, so there is variety. So the Point is, these people would form a kind of Jury, the person who banned them having a stronger effect on the "vote". This way, there will be more people to do a "checks and balances" type of system, and say, "Hey he didnt do anything that bad, he should get less", or "Hey she griefed a lot, lets give her a lengthier ban". If you like the idea, feel free to customize it, to make it work better for this server. Whether it is a good or bad idea, thanks for taking time to read my whole post
. Thanks


