A joint project for all the crafters

Victor1261 · January 16, 2012, 05:05:12 PM

Did you notice that the diagram left out the CN tower?

optical · January 18, 2012, 09:23:40 AM

Hi,

I tried out a 512x512x1024 map locally today, and the miencraft client simply cannot cope with it. It is too large.

It consumes 256mb of memory, which the client cannot handle.

You'll have to reconsider this project I think.

Mr.Monkey · January 18, 2012, 09:51:30 AM

We never intended to do it that big, because it would have loads of unused space at the top.

Quote from: Mr.Monkey on January 13, 2012, 12:32:54 AM
The tower itself is 159x155x828. Plus the surroundings it's 411x393x832. The big world would be (optimised) 416x400x832 ~ 132mb. (...) As for the proposed limit of 80mb, a world of 320x320x832 is just over 81mb.

clawstrider · January 18, 2012, 09:54:08 AM

Quote from: Mr.Monkey on January 18, 2012, 09:51:30 AM
We never intended to do it that big, because it would have loads of unused space at the top.

Quote from: Mr.Monkey on January 13, 2012, 12:32:54 AM
The tower itself is 159x155x828. Plus the surroundings it's 411x393x832. The big world would be (optimised) 416x400x832 ~ 132mb. (...) As for the proposed limit of 80mb, a world of 320x320x832 is just over 81mb.

Out of interest, is it possible to have non cuboid world? For example, for this project a world that is wide at bottom and gets thinner at top.

whatupguys1 · January 18, 2012, 06:09:03 PM

Quote from: optical on January 18, 2012, 09:23:40 AM
Hi,

I tried out a 512x512x1024 map locally today, and the miencraft client simply cannot cope with it. It is too large.

It consumes 256mb of memory, which the client cannot handle.

You'll have to reconsider this project I think.

we already did optical. Like Monkey said the world really only needs 416x400x832 however this can be subject to any changes or limitations you want to make. In the end a world of 320x320x832 would be the minimum required for us. I only said those numbers as an overly open estimate. I will change now the amounts to avoid any further confusion.

optical · January 19, 2012, 02:00:35 AM

Will try out those dimensions when I get home

optical · January 19, 2012, 09:50:24 AM

even 320x320x832 is not loading on wom for me :/

whatupguys1 · January 19, 2012, 08:35:48 PM

Quote from: optical on January 19, 2012, 09:50:24 AM
even 320x320x832 is not loading on wom for me :/

D:

matt88222 · January 19, 2012, 09:12:21 PM

Seems to load up fine for me :\

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgIMSnw9rbQ
(The lagg is from the recording, not actually present in WoM)

Although it does use a huge amount of memory lol:

Probably wouldn't be a good idea to make it the lobby if it ever gets completed

SoulKnightGT · January 19, 2012, 09:23:06 PM

Quote from: matt88222 on January 19, 2012, 09:12:21 PM
Seems to load up fine for me :\

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgIMSnw9rbQ
(The lagg is from the recording, not actually present in WoM)

Although it does use a huge amount of memory lol:

Probably wouldn't be a good idea to make it the lobby if it ever gets completed

Holy crap, thats HUGE...

arsenic_shark · January 19, 2012, 10:47:06 PM

Quote from: clawstrider on January 18, 2012, 09:54:08 AM
Quote from: Mr.Monkey on January 18, 2012, 09:51:30 AM
We never intended to do it that big, because it would have loads of unused space at the top.

Quote from: Mr.Monkey on January 13, 2012, 12:32:54 AM
The tower itself is 159x155x828. Plus the surroundings it's 411x393x832. The big world would be (optimised) 416x400x832 ~ 132mb. (...) As for the proposed limit of 80mb, a world of 320x320x832 is just over 81mb.

Out of interest, is it possible to have non cuboid world? For example, for this project a world that is wide at bottom and gets thinner at top.

I believe Relkeb once said on mumble that to create a new world, he must use a template. So im guessing it has to be certain sized. Also i dont know hard a different shaped world would come about

morten2ela · January 23, 2012, 10:12:57 PM

I believe you still can create a world by specifying x*z*y, but it is usually safer doing it from a template, as a template is tested on forehand!: )

omaroo2 · January 30, 2012, 05:47:25 PM

Someone made it :l
We are too late...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y8F01o9Ros

Mr.Monkey · January 30, 2012, 06:12:52 PM

lawl, I already saw that one, and it pretty much sucks. Pretty sure if we'd do it it would look loads better.

clawstrider · January 30, 2012, 07:41:09 PM

Quote from: omaroo2 on January 30, 2012, 05:47:25 PM
Someone made it :l
We are too late...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y8F01o9Ros

That sucks (compared to what I hope ours will look like) , it has no interior, no notiable exterior... It looks like it was 100% cuboid :/

Victor1261