Opticraft Community

Hey opticrafters,
i have recently realised that some things in the guest world & member world are just
to hard to get sometimes (e.g. leather, due to a plugin which reduces spawning), so
i was thinking, why not make a trusted world with less restrictions which only trusted
and above can access?

Please tell me what you think about this by voting or posting

Thanks,
Square_Skull

No thanks, Trusteds are just members with a orange nametag and 1-2 extra things, why seperate trusteds and members?



-Edit this is most likely reponse to trusted+ resticted areas aswell, same deal (Except world is more major)

-Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif

If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it

Builder + ... fuck.

Quote from: tiggy26668 on December 19, 2012, 08:46:46 PM
If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it

All my yes.

Quote from: ComputerGameLPer on December 19, 2012, 08:39:24 PM
Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif

I think they've even had mods that griefed. Your point is well made.

Trusted world...just no. I can't even explain why we shouldn't, it's just self explanatory.

We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?

Quote from: awesomealicia on December 19, 2012, 09:21:16 PM
We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?

who sais they dont have one?

We dont lol.

Quote from: awesomealicia on December 19, 2012, 09:34:55 PM
We dont lol.

ah

proof it

How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.

Quote from: joshskiizz on December 19, 2012, 09:50:09 PM
How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.

well.... this is how......

*edit* you use a contrapositive =P
and u kinda almost had it....

his argument: if a world exists for mods+, then mod+ has their own world.

ur argument: mod+ don't have a world, therefore a mod+ world doesn't exist =P

*edit edit* (double edit rawr)

u could also go with
his argument: if mod+ has their own world, then a world for mod+ exists

ur argument: a mod+ world doesn't exist, therefore mod+ don't have their own world.

gotta love logic....

Can this be locked it has been discussed before. The answer then was a no so why would it be different now.

ok, thanks everyone for their views,
i did not know this was discussed before though.

Thanks,
Square_Skull

p.s. could this topic be locked now please, seeing as the ansewer is clear?