Discussion forum > Rejected
Crafter Application - dfroster
PIXELDUDE2001:
gl dougtato
MimesisX:
Hello Staff and Fellow Members,
Nick, I understand entirely that a builder is going for your "rank" but may I ask to what standards you refer? If
"Extremely impressive builds, renowned for quality" is your standard than I fail to see all the controversy over Douglas's build, merely standing next them to evokes a sense of awe and accomplishment. If you're going to enforce a standard make a clear category you're rating an individuals building potential/build by.
I suggest a written set of categories available to all, for reference, these categories would be the cornerstone in which each build is measured and would avoid this mess entirely, each category would have a rating of 1-10 and in order to get CRAFTER there would need to be minimum total that is averaged between each Owner/Admins score sheet. For Example; The categories used could be:
WOW Factor!! (When you see this build does it's presence/appearance amaze you)
SIZE (Speaks for itself)
CREATIVITY (It's it a cookie cutter build or is it true inspiration)
EFFORT (How much time and dedication did it take to complete the build)
COMPLETION (Amount of Project Completed)
DETAIL (Is everything that can be done with respect to the build done in order to breathe life into it
RESPONSIBILITY (This applies to his maturity to handle the /kick function and should be considered)
Those listed should be totaled up and averaged together across the people judging it , and if the score exceeds the minimum threshold of lets say 55/70 then BOOM! crafter. I totally respect all of you making this judgement and how you're worried about how it will affect Doug, but I think I believe part of the problem here is none truly has set a standard and a many of us feel the process needs more oversight and standardization.
If we can advance the server together we'll have a much more pleasant experience overall <3 because in the end, the server would be a lonely place without it's members.
TheWholeLoaf:
--- Quote from: MimesisX on January 07, 2015, 05:11:55 am ---
I suggest a written set of categories available to all, for reference, these categories would be the cornerstone in which each build is measured and would avoid this mess entirely.
--- End quote ---
What mess are you referring to? As far as I can see, there is no problem that needs attention. We are all just commenting on the application, nothing more. The owners and admins already have their ways of judging. You already need promission from one of them to even apply, so by that you already know you are either there or close.
And as previously stated, players are not to think they are to build to a specific standard, so a rubric would be counterproductive in that aspect. For some players it might be nice, for others, it may have a negative effect.
However, this is a topic for creative suggestions, as to not get this application off topic.
Nick3306:
--- Quote from: MimesisX on January 07, 2015, 05:11:55 am ---Hello Staff and Fellow Members,
Nick, I understand entirely that a builder is going for your "rank" but may I ask to what standards you refer? If
"Extremely impressive builds, renowned for quality" is your standard than I fail to see all the controversy over Douglas's build, merely standing next them to evokes a sense of awe and accomplishment. If you're going to enforce a standard make a clear category you're rating an individuals building potential/build by.
I suggest a written set of categories available to all, for reference, these categories would be the cornerstone in which each build is measured and would avoid this mess entirely, each category would have a rating of 1-10 and in order to get CRAFTER there would need to be minimum total that is averaged between each Owner/Admins score sheet. For Example; The categories used could be:
WOW Factor!! (When you see this build does it's presence/appearance amaze you)
SIZE (Speaks for itself)
CREATIVITY (It's it a cookie cutter build or is it true inspiration)
EFFORT (How much time and dedication did it take to complete the build)
COMPLETION (Amount of Project Completed)
DETAIL (Is everything that can be done with respect to the build done in order to breathe life into it
RESPONSIBILITY (This applies to his maturity to handle the /kick function and should be considered)
Those listed should be totaled up and averaged together across the people judging it , and if the score exceeds the minimum threshold of lets say 55/70 then BOOM! crafter. I totally respect all of you making this judgement and how you're worried about how it will affect Doug, but I think I believe part of the problem here is none truly has set a standard and a many of us feel the process needs more oversight and standardization.
If we can advance the server together we'll have a much more pleasant experience overall <3 because in the end, the server would be a lonely place without it's members.
--- End quote ---
You misunderstand, there is no controversy over dougs builds. I was simply responding to a statement that DJ made in a general sense. I was not talking about any app in particular it just happened to be in dougs app which is probably not the place for it. sorry.
And mime, you cant standardize a process to judge creative builds because each one is uniquely different.
VoreReznor:
Well Judging only on that treehouse I would say "Congrats"
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version