Discussion forum > Suggestions

Trusted Suggestions (No, not asking for more perks)

<< < (3/4) > >>

TarynMai:

--- Quote from: Kodak28 on April 24, 2013, 09:54:51 pm ---
As far as standardizing the procedure, that is something I do agree with to a degree.  If we were to create a more standardized ranking system we would still need certain numerical values for an initial basis, such as the person would have to be a member on the forum for at least a month, with no ban history.  If they do have ban history for whatever reason then there would at least need to be a month since the time the ban expired before they would be eligible, and possibly extended time of wait depending on the severity of the ban and/or quantity.  To make this plausible the extended time would have set limits as well to keep things standardized.  By incorporating some ideas like this with more specific standards you begin to eliminate a bit of the discrepancy that comes from just having staff choose whatever they think fits best, although there is really no true way to get rid of that inconsistency completely based again on the premise of trust.

--- End quote ---
We do go by time though, although I normally would wait more than a month of being member. If thats not what you meant, then sorry I couldn't be asked to read all of that. :p

Kodak28:
lol I know I typed a lot there, I'm just saying from what I've seen there isn't a specific amount of time we have written as a guideline where after that time someone would be eligible, even if that is something helps in the decision in general. 

Really, putting a certain value on a few things wouldn't change much if anything, but it might give people a few more specific ideas to satisfy them on more of a standard procedure instead of it seeming to be so open ended.  And the month/time thing was just an example, not really what I'm suggesting as a final idea.

Nick3306:

--- Quote from: Kodak28 on April 25, 2013, 08:09:21 pm ---lol I know I typed a lot there, I'm just saying from what I've seen there isn't a specific amount of time we have written as a guideline where after that time someone would be eligible, even if that is something helps in the decision in general. 

Really, putting a certain value on a few things wouldn't change much if anything, but it might give people a few more specific ideas to satisfy them on more of a standard procedure instead of it seeming to be so open ended.  And the month/time thing was just an example, not really what I'm suggesting as a final idea.

--- End quote ---
The problem with that is once people pass that period of time, they will continuously ask for trusted because they meet all the qualifications.

treestreet10:
First of all I do not agree with any and I have reasons why...

1. As trusted I only see few people asking how to get trusted and even vewer asking for trusted. When I see this I try to give them the best summary of trusted.

2. I do no see people getting jealous of colors..in fact (at least when I was a member) the colored name encouraged me to to see my name bright and orange as it is now.

3. The timer and points are not that smart because in time and not getting your self noticed is basically giving a kid a pat on the back and a "good job" and "you earned it" when they didn't do anything

4. I think the trusted rank is fine how it is....I worked hard, made more friends, and became noticed..if people ask how to "get" trusted that shouldnt be bad in fact its good because we "trusted" can share our stories and give them something to work for...at least that's what happened to me..we were all members at one point :P

Chipaton:
Whats wrong with how the current system works? (Sorry if this has been said in the wall of text)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page