1.3 World!

[High Roller]

Morrison hit the target. People have already poured loads of work into the member world just be happy with it

[<>LavaEvan<>]

It wouldn't Replace the member or guest world, it would be a 3rd world.

[Morrison1996]

It wouldn't Replace the member or guest world, it would be a 3rd world.

Like I said.

Be happy with the member world. It is fairly new still.

the Key words there are fairly new. Since it just came out and the developers are still trying to work kinks out it is not a good time to just put everything down and start work on another world.

[Chief149]

Perhaps it should also be mentioned that a third world means another 3 to 6 gB of RAM required + the CPU overhead of having to process the active chunks across 3 worlds instead of two. Heck, 1 world was about enough for the server to handle.

[Wratkie]

what we needed to do in my opinion was just do a complete reset at some point, but allow the maps for download like the 1.8 map. Its nice to start off fresh especially after 6-7 months. Maybe it could've been a server news with a poll so every one could have a chance to vote.

But for created a third world, that would be way to much right now and probably wont happen.

[piplupdude]

Wratkie, Nick- Would a world reset take away blocks in my inventory?

[Wratkie]

Wratkie, Nick- Would a world reset take away blocks in my inventory?

yes, basically what i was saying all data would be wiped and everyone would have to start from scratch.
so yes

[Xeadin]

This is the reason why we tell you all to appreciate what we have to offer for you thus far. We cannot swallow more than we can chew too early, since it may lead to further instability. We still have a LOT of stuff to iron out in the member world-- especially with the 1.3.1 update.