This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Kodak28
16
« on: June 20, 2013, 04:32:14 am »
Age: 16 Location: Wisconsin, USA Timezone: gmt -6 Join Date: Classic: Jan 30th, 2012. Forum: Feb 14th, 2012. Smp: Who knows, some time last July? Were you recommended by anyone?: Right now I wish I had sae’s quote about my need for recommendations, but nevertheless feel free to add your name. (And raul, don't forget the raul)TroddenOstrich.. feet, not moses. pork  , Zeradeth, GirlLuvzerMac a1374thspartan, Mr_Mr Why you should become a moderator: I was a mod back in March but I resigned because I really needed to focus primarily on school for the last couple of months and couldn’t afford to spend time in game. Now that this school year has ended I have a lot more free time that I’m willing to spend on the server and it would be nice to help out once again as a mod. I miss helping people out and all I really do on the server now is walk around in circles and talk to people. It would be nice to do something productive again for a change, so vote for Kodak.
17
« on: June 07, 2013, 04:25:00 am »
Hmmm...that would be awesome if I could enter with my viola, playing in guitar position
Do it.
lol that's allowed? now I'm tempted to do that with my viola too just because...
18
« on: April 26, 2013, 09:24:07 pm »
for the record the 2nd one was false, im only double jointed in my fingers.
I did kill my pet bird with a metal stick but I was about 2 or 3 years old, and I did eat so many carrots at one point my skin actually did turn orange
19
« on: April 25, 2013, 08:09:21 pm »
lol I know I typed a lot there, I'm just saying from what I've seen there isn't a specific amount of time we have written as a guideline where after that time someone would be eligible, even if that is something helps in the decision in general.
Really, putting a certain value on a few things wouldn't change much if anything, but it might give people a few more specific ideas to satisfy them on more of a standard procedure instead of it seeming to be so open ended. And the month/time thing was just an example, not really what I'm suggesting as a final idea.
20
« on: April 24, 2013, 11:30:41 pm »
In response to Kodak, I'm gonna go with number 2 which is the third one listed to obviously confuse people into saying 3. so my answer is number 2.
I have no idea what you are talking about...
21
« on: April 24, 2013, 09:54:51 pm »
People have already mentioned some of the flaws with each of the ideas presented specifically, most of which I agree with, but an automatic system would never work well for a rank based on trust. There are too many factors that go into trusting someone that a system could not take into consideration in general. Trust is earned by people and how you handle yourself in the game, not by a certain quantity of responses or time that an automatic system could somehow interpret as “trustworthiness” and as with any system people would find loopholes just to get themself ranked.
As far as standardizing the procedure, that is something I do agree with to a degree. If we were to create a more standardized ranking system we would still need certain numerical values for an initial basis, such as the person would have to be a member on the forum for at least a month, with no ban history. If they do have ban history for whatever reason then there would at least need to be a month since the time the ban expired before they would be eligible, and possibly extended time of wait depending on the severity of the ban and/or quantity. To make this plausible the extended time would have set limits as well to keep things standardized. By incorporating some ideas like this with more specific standards you begin to eliminate a bit of the discrepancy that comes from just having staff choose whatever they think fits best, although there is really no true way to get rid of that inconsistency completely based again on the premise of trust. These ideas are solely just give people a slightly better grasp on qualifications and things to look for rather than it being entirely open ended with no real explanation. Once again trust cannot simply be defined by some value, but it also gives staff a few more direct things to take into consideration. The whole idea is to make things a bit more clear cut since so many seem to have problems with the current manner of deciding how people are promoted to trusted.
22
« on: April 24, 2013, 02:55:01 am »
Even though there hasn't exactly been a resolution to the previous I'm going to post one anyway.
1. When I was a baby I ate so many carrots I managed to turn myself orange.
2. I'm double jointed in both of my arms.
3. I killed my pet bird by stabbing it with a metal stick.
23
« on: April 22, 2013, 09:40:11 pm »
lililiililillili or something like that...
24
« on: April 22, 2013, 12:48:46 am »
one in the middle
25
« on: April 21, 2013, 10:50:07 pm »
Pic of a couple of my friends and I from yesterday. 
26
« on: April 13, 2013, 02:36:36 am »
nah I didn't get the chance, it would've been another long drive to get to that point from where I was at which is really too bad
27
« on: April 12, 2013, 08:58:06 pm »
So you must like cheese.
I'm not sure what's worse, the fact that you brought that up first thing, or the fact that while I was reading it I was actually eating cheese as a snack lol go Wisconsinites. Anywho, heres where I was chilling a couple weeks ago when I left on vacation. 
28
« on: March 16, 2013, 07:51:11 pm »
considering this was my idea to begin with long ago... I'll be glad to help when I can, especially with any animals you want implemented
30
« on: February 15, 2013, 02:47:43 am »
These builds are quite nice mitchel, however I would like to see more detail and shape with them. The one large tower's shape is nice but it lacks detail. The houses are nice as well but those too could be a bit larger, more detailed, and shapely. Keep working though, I know you'll get there eventually.
Unfortunately, Rejected.
|
Show Posts