Opticraft Community
Discussion forum => Legacy => Archives => Suggestions => Topic started by: square_skull on December 19, 2012, 08:36:47 pm
-
Hey opticrafters,
i have recently realised that some things in the guest world & member world are just
to hard to get sometimes (e.g. leather, due to a plugin which reduces spawning), so
i was thinking, why not make a trusted world with less restrictions which only trusted
and above can access?
Please tell me what you think about this by voting or posting
Thanks,
Square_Skull
-
No thanks, Trusteds are just members with a orange nametag and 1-2 extra things, why seperate trusteds and members?
-Edit this is most likely reponse to trusted+ resticted areas aswell, same deal (Except world is more major)
-Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif
-
If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it :P
-
Builder + ... fuck.
-
If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it :P
All my yes.
-
Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif
I think they've even had mods that griefed. Your point is well made.
-
Trusted world...just no. I can't even explain why we shouldn't, it's just self explanatory.
-
We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?
-
We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?
who sais they dont have one?
-
We dont lol.
-
We dont lol.
ah
proof it
-
How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.
-
How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.
well.... this is how...... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance)
*edit* you use a contrapositive =P
and u kinda almost had it....
his argument: if a world exists for mods+, then mod+ has their own world.
ur argument: mod+ don't have a world, therefore a mod+ world doesn't exist =P
*edit edit* (double edit rawr)
u could also go with
his argument: if mod+ has their own world, then a world for mod+ exists
ur argument: a mod+ world doesn't exist, therefore mod+ don't have their own world.
gotta love logic....
-
Can this be locked it has been discussed before. The answer then was a no so why would it be different now.
-
ok, thanks everyone for their views,
i did not know this was discussed before though.
Thanks,
Square_Skull
p.s. could this topic be locked now please, seeing as the ansewer is clear?