Opticraft Community

Discussion forum => Applications => Classic => Archives => Accepted => Topic started by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 03:49:39 pm

Title: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 03:49:39 pm

Ingame name: officiersmirnof
Join date: September 07, 2011,
Briefly describe all your creations: a voc ship in recruit29, bibliotheek recruit30, cruise ship current recruit, container ship current recruit , a head of a monster current recruit
What worlds are the creations on: all recruit world 29,30,current recruit
Links to screenshots of the creation: http://s1216.photobucket.com/albums/dd366/officiersmirnof/
Names of players who helped contribute:i am not sure but i think gameguy96 by the voc ship and the rest made i myself
What is your current rank in Opticraft ?: recruit
Extra (Anything else you want to mention): i am stil buildig things bud i wanted to see if this whas enough for builder
Do you agree with our terms(http://www.opticraft.net/index.php?topic=3.0) ?: i agree


Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 09, 2012, 03:52:35 pm
You need to make the album public ;)
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: gameguy96 on February 09, 2012, 03:52:47 pm
gl man :3 i support u :P, and btw. bibliotheek? dont u mean libary? XD
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: gameguy96 on February 09, 2012, 03:56:05 pm
btw. the album is online now
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 03:57:43 pm
yes i ment library  ;D
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 09, 2012, 04:04:07 pm
Could you please include pictures of the interior of your builds?
Also, I would suggest downloading World of Minecraft (http://www.opticraft.net/index.php/topic,2532.0.html) to make building and taking screenshots easier.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 04:06:40 pm
i wil make screenshots from the inside and i dont know how to download worldofminecraft i already tried that but i didnt work
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 05:06:25 pm
the inside of the buildings are on photobucket
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: officiersmirnof on February 09, 2012, 05:14:01 pm
there are 5 albums of the buildings
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Llyrrr (XpLo) on February 09, 2012, 05:15:20 pm
Accepted.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Mr_Mr_Mr on February 09, 2012, 11:03:55 pm
Accepted.
I'm sorry, what!? Accepted!? I vote for a re-consideration of this apps direction, this should not have been accepted.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 09, 2012, 11:25:17 pm
Accepted.
I'm sorry, what!? Accepted!? I vote for a re-consideration of this apps direction, this should not have been accepted.
I have to agree to a part. I was about to reject this myself when Xplo accepted it.
However, I don't think it's right to take a promotion back. For this reason, I vote he keeps it.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: clawstrider on February 10, 2012, 10:37:06 am
Accepted.
I'm sorry, what!? Accepted!? I vote for a re-consideration of this apps direction, this should not have been accepted.
I have to agree to a part. I was about to reject this myself when Xplo accepted it.
However, I don't think it's right to take a promotion back. For this reason, I vote he keeps it.

Its been done before. I vote for re-consideration aswell, this isn't builder standard.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 10, 2012, 02:12:50 pm
Accepted.
I'm sorry, what!? Accepted!? I vote for a re-consideration of this apps direction, this should not have been accepted.
I have to agree to a part. I was about to reject this myself when Xplo accepted it.
However, I don't think it's right to take a promotion back. For this reason, I vote he keeps it.

Its been done before. I vote for re-consideration aswell, this isn't builder standard.
So do we get an Admin's approval for reversal, or just vote on it?
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: clawstrider on February 10, 2012, 06:00:56 pm
Accepted.
I'm sorry, what!? Accepted!? I vote for a re-consideration of this apps direction, this should not have been accepted.
I have to agree to a part. I was about to reject this myself when Xplo accepted it.
However, I don't think it's right to take a promotion back. For this reason, I vote he keeps it.

Its been done before. I vote for re-consideration aswell, this isn't builder standard.
So do we get an Admin's approval for reversal, or just vote on it?

Pretty sure that I can demote him, now that 3 of us have agreed that it isn't worthy of builder. I will leave this up here for a few hours, if anyone wants to argue, but if not, can someone demote him, or I will when I get ingame.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Xeadin on February 10, 2012, 11:03:44 pm
Agreed, this isn't quite what we had in mind for builder quality. It's a close call, though

Just a reminder-- if you're unsure of whether the applicant deserves a promotion or not, it's probably best to let a more experienced operator know about it so that they can provide better feedback.

On that note...
I can see some unique structures in this, which we do look for, but the general state of the builds appear a bit vague. Try working on rounding out the straight edges and practice on curves.

Moved to Rejected-- you are on the right track, so don't let this discourage you.

[edit] :o Wow, how'd I end up moving this to the SMP Applications? Silly me...

Relocated to Classic apps ;D
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Mr_Mr_Mr on February 10, 2012, 11:05:09 pm
Thank you for taking charge there xeadin.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Nick3306 on February 10, 2012, 11:44:00 pm
You guys seriously need to sort out this stuff earlier. This guy had the false hope of being a builder for a day before you decided to demote him. I for one would be extremely pissed. Just be more careful next time.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: DeeKay on February 18, 2012, 04:35:42 pm
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Mr_Mr_Mr on February 18, 2012, 07:39:17 pm
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.
Are you kidding me. 4 ops voted to have this rejected. It should stay that way.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 18, 2012, 07:48:31 pm
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.
Are you kidding me. 4 ops voted to have this rejected. It should stay that way.
Mr. He's already made his decision. To take it back again is out of the question.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: SoulKnightGT on February 18, 2012, 07:51:01 pm
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.
Are you kidding me. 4 ops voted to have this rejected. It should stay that way.
I would also agree with this.
But like Your_mine said,
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.
Are you kidding me. 4 ops voted to have this rejected. It should stay that way.
To take it back again is out of the question.
It would just be wrong.
Title: Re: builder application officiersmirnof
Post by: Your_Mine on February 18, 2012, 07:54:22 pm
Locking this.
The decision's been made. We may not agree with it, but at this point only an admin has the right to overturn it.