you have NO actual signature of this person agreeing to your laws, and NO a post does not count as signature.
This was land, that is rightfully ours, He built on it without permission from usSo land claimed by a paint line am i correct?
Second of all, i quite frankly DO NOT care about your city's rules as these rules are not abdided by the entire server, so thus makes these laws petty and rather pointless.
your city's rules as these rules are not abdided by the entire server
Correct, The laws do not apply on the entire server. The laws only apply on those who signed & agreed to it. IE: Official citizens of Stuttgart.
But i was present at the scene, so thus it gives me the right to post, so i will post as I feel necessary.
Third of all you placed blocks on HIS island which counts as grief and the you destroyed HIS land bridge with is further grief
QuoteCorrect, The laws do not apply on the entire server. The laws only apply on those who signed & agreed to it. IE: Official citizens of Stuttgart.
But by posting something, It is not, and I repeat IS NOT a signature.
In addition, You are a biased person. Both you, and I have had grievances, and you do not like me, a wee bit. I suspect that you are supporting false claims out of vengeance.
In addition, Out of fear of you being biased towards this entire case, I don't want you to be involved in it either. (Edit: In the decision on whom the Island belongs to)
Hmmm.
Tabooti.
Why did you have to be so freaking difficult?
U said.
Acorn u annexed half your land so Igenerator didnt include it
Me: Oh. U can make a fence around the whole place include it all
U: No I just cant deal with it your out
Right?
Ur friend built on a constitution site
It was a fence not even a building
So I replaced it a bit on the side
Now.
We agreed
That I would annex my land right?
I asked so hypothetically speaking U could kick me out?
U replied by saying
Yes I would but I will NOT
If I left stuttgard then it would be reasonable if u said Ok gimme the land
But I didn't
And if I go in stuttgard even if I am a citizen
And destroy somebody else's home, it is griefing member or not
This is a ban appeal, not an argument or RPG based court case - so please do not argue, or become defensive as pretty much all you need to say has in fact been said...
Tabooti, I don't want to get fully involved with your dispute but the laws that are in effect inside of your town do not alter the server's rules itself. You must still abide by the rules whatever your town or "government" says and destroying something that someone else made knowingly is no exception. Your town is inside the server so it is in fact governed by the server's rules, not your own. The untouched land that you have said to have taken control of is very large but you have not untill recently marked out in-game where the border is to lay.
Regardless, the land you have claimed is rediculiously large and considering you were away for a fairly long while you expect everything to be the same when you get back to your unbordered and unprotected city? I'm sure it is not that big of a deal to give away a tiny amount of your land to Acorn and this issue can be resolved a lot quicker.
I was not there at the time but after talking to people I am not going to take anyones side and I'm sorry if I have missed anything, but it seems to me you have overlooked a few things.
This is a ban appeal, not an argument or RPG based court case - so please do not argue, or become defensive as pretty much all you need to say has in fact been said...
Tabooti, I don't want to get fully involved with your dispute but the laws that are in effect inside of your town do not alter the server's rules itself. You must still abide by the rules whatever your town or "government" says and destroying something that someone else made knowingly is no exception. Your town is inside the server so it is in fact governed by the server's rules, not your own. The untouched land that you have said to have taken control of is very large but you have not untill recently marked out in-game where the border is to lay.
Regardless, the land you have claimed is rediculiously large and considering you were away for a fairly long while you expect everything to be the same when you get back to your unbordered and unprotected city? I'm sure it is not that big of a deal to give away a tiny amount of your land to Acorn and this issue can be resolved a lot quicker.
I was not there at the time but after talking to people I am not going to take anyones side and I'm sorry if I have missed anything, but it seems to me you have overlooked a few things.
The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
As for the protection stones. The city thread *And lawbook* was created as a replacement to the protection stones, given that the subject agrees to the law.The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
Would you be willing to settle if the bridge to your land was to be removed and the fence over Acorn's land were both to be removed, and your fence move around the island and surrounding water? Acorn is happy to remove the bridge if you are willing to move the fence onto the edge of your land? :)
Yes, We're willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding.
Yes, We're willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding.
Alright, dewey should be on soon to review the ban and hopefully sort it out.
500th post *yay*
As for the protection stones. The city thread *And lawbook* was created as a replacement to the protection stones, given that the subject agrees to the law.The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
Would you be willing to settle if the bridge to your land was to be removed and the fence over Acorn's land were both to be removed, and your fence move around the island and surrounding water? Acorn is happy to remove the bridge if you are willing to move the fence onto the edge of your land? :)
I mean, we could have just included his land, But he doesn't obey by the rules, and that's why it was returned.
We may be willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding, on the status of the bridge.
However, Why can't we simply have our half? I've already provided evidence of AcornBulb recognizing our border claims.
The island really isn't that much land and acorn isn't really asking for a lot ;)
As for the protection stones. The city thread *And lawbook* was created as a replacement to the protection stones, given that the subject agrees to the law.The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
Would you be willing to settle if the bridge to your land was to be removed and the fence over Acorn's land were both to be removed, and your fence move around the island and surrounding water? Acorn is happy to remove the bridge if you are willing to move the fence onto the edge of your land? :)
I mean, we could have just included his land, But he doesn't obey by the rules, and that's why it was returned.
We may be willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding, on the status of the bridge.
However, Why can't we simply have our half? I've already provided evidence of AcornBulb recognizing our border claims.
After being banned you are saying this
Before u bad a huge fuss about this
I voluntarily said u can have ALL the land and make a Fence Around it
But you didn't agree
And now u want to split it?
No.
The island really isn't that much land and acorn isn't really asking for a lot ;)
So you do recognize that He is the offensive party, and that we are the defensive one?
If so, I don't see the need to argue this anymore, Since we're being generous, and giving him his half of the Island. And keeping ours (The half that he has not touched yet).As for the protection stones. The city thread *And lawbook* was created as a replacement to the protection stones, given that the subject agrees to the law.The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
Would you be willing to settle if the bridge to your land was to be removed and the fence over Acorn's land were both to be removed, and your fence move around the island and surrounding water? Acorn is happy to remove the bridge if you are willing to move the fence onto the edge of your land? :)
I mean, we could have just included his land, But he doesn't obey by the rules, and that's why it was returned.
We may be willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding, on the status of the bridge.
However, Why can't we simply have our half? I've already provided evidence of AcornBulb recognizing our border claims.
After being banned you are saying this
Before u bad a huge fuss about this
I voluntarily said u can have ALL the land and make a Fence Around it
But you didn't agree
And now u want to split it?
No.
There was an agreement that you didn't read.
The ENTIRE Island, is not yours to begin with. On the other hand, It's not even a large portion of it.
It's not "Splitting it" It's returning your land to you.
Your land was the other half of the Island, and the part that we both agreed to annex to Stuttgart (As you said)
I could have simply taken over the entire region that we annexed, and instructed you to leave, since you agreed that it wasn't yours.
I'm not that kind of person. I'm returning what is rightfully yours, and clinging on what belongs to our city.
We don't want your region anymore.
And what difference does it make, if you're willing to give up ALL your land, as opposed to a small dinky portion of an Island.
The island really isn't that much land and acorn isn't really asking for a lot ;)
So you do recognize that He is the offensive party, and that we are the defensive one?
If so, I don't see the need to argue this anymore, Since we're being generous, and giving him his half of the Island. And keeping ours (The half that he has not touched yet).As for the protection stones. The city thread *And lawbook* was created as a replacement to the protection stones, given that the subject agrees to the law.The base of the Problem is whom the Island belongs to, And there are NO rules anywhere outside the city threads, that make it clear on what is valid claims or not.Protection stones and project/city protection are both within the rules and very clear ways in which protection/claims area avalible. Borders around your area, be it walls or fences, are not protected or in the rules but easily define where your area is.
Would you be willing to settle if the bridge to your land was to be removed and the fence over Acorn's land were both to be removed, and your fence move around the island and surrounding water? Acorn is happy to remove the bridge if you are willing to move the fence onto the edge of your land? :)
I mean, we could have just included his land, But he doesn't obey by the rules, and that's why it was returned.
We may be willing to settle for that.
Provided that I am pardoned for the misunderstanding, on the status of the bridge.
However, Why can't we simply have our half? I've already provided evidence of AcornBulb recognizing our border claims.
After being banned you are saying this
Before u bad a huge fuss about this
I voluntarily said u can have ALL the land and make a Fence Around it
But you didn't agree
And now u want to split it?
No.
There was an agreement that you didn't read.
The ENTIRE Island, is not yours to begin with. On the other hand, It's not even a large portion of it.
It's not "Splitting it" It's returning your land to you.
Your land was the other half of the Island, and the part that we both agreed to annex to Stuttgart (As you said)
I could have simply taken over the entire region that we annexed, and instructed you to leave, since you agreed that it wasn't yours.
I'm not that kind of person. I'm returning what is rightfully yours, and clinging on what belongs to our city.
We don't want your region anymore.
And what difference does it make, if you're willing to give up ALL your land, as opposed to a small dinky portion of an Island.
Simply because I dont like you.
And I dont want a fence going through the middle of my property
And u agreed that if I annexed my land you will not kick me out of the city
Im not an idiot
I wouldn't have given you the land if you didnt agree to not kicking me out
I dont want to give you my island
Its my choice.
ANd I dont want you
Simply because I dont like you?
And 2nd of all.
This is an unban topic.
Keep it that way.