Show Posts
1
Rejected / Re: Crafter Application - dfroster
« on: January 07, 2015, 05:11:55 am »
Hello Staff and Fellow Members,
Nick, I understand entirely that a builder is going for your "rank" but may I ask to what standards you refer? If
"Extremely impressive builds, renowned for quality" is your standard than I fail to see all the controversy over Douglas's build, merely standing next them to evokes a sense of awe and accomplishment. If you're going to enforce a standard make a clear category you're rating an individuals building potential/build by.
I suggest a written set of categories available to all, for reference, these categories would be the cornerstone in which each build is measured and would avoid this mess entirely, each category would have a rating of 1-10 and in order to get CRAFTER there would need to be minimum total that is averaged between each Owner/Admins score sheet. For Example; The categories used could be:
WOW Factor!! (When you see this build does it's presence/appearance amaze you)
SIZE (Speaks for itself)
CREATIVITY (It's it a cookie cutter build or is it true inspiration)
EFFORT (How much time and dedication did it take to complete the build)
COMPLETION (Amount of Project Completed)
DETAIL (Is everything that can be done with respect to the build done in order to breathe life into it
RESPONSIBILITY (This applies to his maturity to handle the /kick function and should be considered)
Those listed should be totaled up and averaged together across the people judging it , and if the score exceeds the minimum threshold of lets say 55/70 then BOOM! crafter. I totally respect all of you making this judgement and how you're worried about how it will affect Doug, but I think I believe part of the problem here is none truly has set a standard and a many of us feel the process needs more oversight and standardization.
If we can advance the server together we'll have a much more pleasant experience overall <3 because in the end, the server would be a lonely place without it's members.
Nick, I understand entirely that a builder is going for your "rank" but may I ask to what standards you refer? If
"Extremely impressive builds, renowned for quality" is your standard than I fail to see all the controversy over Douglas's build, merely standing next them to evokes a sense of awe and accomplishment. If you're going to enforce a standard make a clear category you're rating an individuals building potential/build by.
I suggest a written set of categories available to all, for reference, these categories would be the cornerstone in which each build is measured and would avoid this mess entirely, each category would have a rating of 1-10 and in order to get CRAFTER there would need to be minimum total that is averaged between each Owner/Admins score sheet. For Example; The categories used could be:
WOW Factor!! (When you see this build does it's presence/appearance amaze you)
SIZE (Speaks for itself)
CREATIVITY (It's it a cookie cutter build or is it true inspiration)
EFFORT (How much time and dedication did it take to complete the build)
COMPLETION (Amount of Project Completed)
DETAIL (Is everything that can be done with respect to the build done in order to breathe life into it
RESPONSIBILITY (This applies to his maturity to handle the /kick function and should be considered)
Those listed should be totaled up and averaged together across the people judging it , and if the score exceeds the minimum threshold of lets say 55/70 then BOOM! crafter. I totally respect all of you making this judgement and how you're worried about how it will affect Doug, but I think I believe part of the problem here is none truly has set a standard and a many of us feel the process needs more oversight and standardization.
If we can advance the server together we'll have a much more pleasant experience overall <3 because in the end, the server would be a lonely place without it's members.
