Discussion forum > Suggestions
A new rank
DJAlphaWolf:
As a trusted, I believe lava should stick with mods. Mods can handle lava and grief requests, whereas trusted can deal with water and fire (like it already is)
As for the rank in between, it might be an interesting implementation, however, like witchiwa has stated, it will probably serve a "decorative" purpose (our most trusted members). We could give them teleport or "chat mod" powers....maybe. Adding extra block-related power permissions (lava, water blocks) should be out of the question, though. Otherwise, you may as well just call them mod.
bigbeno37:
--- Quote from: DJAlphaWolf on April 30, 2012, 04:31:48 am ---As a trusted, I believe lava should stick with mods. Mods can handle lava and grief requests, whereas trusted can deal with water and fire (like it already is)
As for the rank in between, it might be an interesting implementation, however, like witchiwa has stated, it will probably serve a "decorative" purpose (our most trusted members). We could give them teleport or "chat mod" powers....maybe. Adding extra block-related power permissions (lava, water blocks) should be out of the question, though. Otherwise, you may as well just call them mod.
--- End quote ---
And as I said:
--- Quote from: bigbeno37 on April 30, 2012, 03:19:45 am ---
--- Quote from: Nick3306 on April 30, 2012, 02:13:23 am ---
--- Quote from: witchawa on April 30, 2012, 02:02:07 am ---
--- Quote from: Nick3306 on April 30, 2012, 01:57:35 am ---
--- Quote from: witchawa on April 30, 2012, 01:56:09 am ---
--- Quote from: Varrager on April 30, 2012, 01:39:19 am ---Why not have a "helper" rank. they would play this role of a "decorator" yet they also get the ability to kick over players. they would have to be the most trusted of the trusted.
--- End quote ---
Eh, not necessarily kick people, just get lava placement. I for one would lava a TON more if I had it readily accesible.
--- End quote ---
That is the exact reason why it is not readily accessible.
--- End quote ---
For decorative purposes (what else would it be used for?). Plus, that's why m suggesting it to be harder to get than trusted, maybe just as hard as mod, without the responsibility of having to be a mod. This is a survival server (that phrase gets thrown around a lot), and in survival you can place lava.
--- End quote ---
The last thing we need is more decorative lava that increases the chances of a mistake happening.
--- End quote ---
But think about it. This member would have to be EXTREMELY trusted to get this rank. As Witchawa said, this could possibly be for people that want something more than Trusted, but don't want the hassles and possible stress from being Moderator. Not everyone wants a ton of responsibility, but instead they may want a little bit of it. I could quite possibly seeing this idea become realistic, so, good idea witchawa. But, in regards to lowering the donations, they are donations. It's not like they are actual products. Granted they come with some extras, but the main thing regarding them is that they're donations.
--- End quote ---
This could be the rank for people who want more power than Trusted, but less worries than Moderator. Granted, I do see your point.
Smiteme69:
I personally would like to help more, I would have tried applying for mod but I don't feel I'm on enough to gain that rank.
The idea is a great one but I can't see it happening to be honest.
/Smite
Boshiwarrior:
--- Quote from: tbpb2010 on April 30, 2012, 03:39:29 am ---Too bad lava damage from player placed lava can't be disabled :/
--- End quote ---
With a Plugin is everything possible. I have my own bukkit server and I have seen tons of Plugins. But if you disabled it, the survival will get lower. Lava is a true survive thing!
I don't think we need a new rank. We already have a lot of trusted and moderators on Opticraft. This rank is only a upgrade for trusted persons to place lava. If there comes a new rank we need more reason to make a new rank.
realduckgoesmoo:
can someone tell me how u rank up in the game.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version