Discussion forum > Accepted

builder application officiersmirnof

<< < (4/5) > >>

Xeadin:
Agreed, this isn't quite what we had in mind for builder quality. It's a close call, though

Just a reminder-- if you're unsure of whether the applicant deserves a promotion or not, it's probably best to let a more experienced operator know about it so that they can provide better feedback.

On that note...
I can see some unique structures in this, which we do look for, but the general state of the builds appear a bit vague. Try working on rounding out the straight edges and practice on curves.

Moved to Rejected-- you are on the right track, so don't let this discourage you.

[edit] :o Wow, how'd I end up moving this to the SMP Applications? Silly me...

Relocated to Classic apps ;D

Mr_Mr_Mr:
Thank you for taking charge there xeadin.

Nick3306:
You guys seriously need to sort out this stuff earlier. This guy had the false hope of being a builder for a day before you decided to demote him. I for one would be extremely pissed. Just be more careful next time.

DeeKay:
XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.

Mr_Mr_Mr:

--- Quote from: xDeeKay on February 18, 2012, 04:35:42 pm ---XpLoZzIv has re-promoted officiersmirnof to Builder.
Therefor, moved to Accepted.

--- End quote ---
Are you kidding me. 4 ops voted to have this rejected. It should stay that way.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version