Discussion forum > General Discussion
Do people go for aesthetics or functionality?
RuthlessTomato:
--- Quote from: frobalt on May 13, 2013, 09:18:10 pm ---Wow, you guys certainly have big houses.
Much better looking than mine as well.
Mines: http://smp.opticraft.net/map/#/-1247/64/2485/-1/1/0
The gold farm is the most impressive part of it :P
--- End quote ---
dont blame yourself for being not as impressive of a builder as tiggy. tiggy was the one who built the spawn and he is kind of like one of the best builders. evar.
Duinis:
I go with HEAVY aesthetics, screw functionality. Jk :P Most or all of my builds are pretty yet work well for their purpose.
Nikoljan:
I think it's good to have a balance of both. But in the end Minecraft is about creating anything in your imagination. As for the users on the server I think it's about 50/50 everyone's got their fancy doo-dad house as well as a farm to get supplies.
Supah_:
I love aesthetics but I am just simply, terrible. Most of my houses are for functionality and are never really taken into account for, looks wise. But, to contradict myself, I'm currently have a prototype, based on Thief in Opti
http://imgur.com/AZF6t95
http://imgur.com/BQQYXpy,DpMnA9j
OzzyKP:
My functional stuff is all hidden away out of view, my city is pretty much for aesthetics. I try to make it realistic though and hope to have more redstone in it someday.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version