Discussion forum > Suggestions

How about we change how owning land works?

<< < (2/3) > >>

cattfish0612:
Ok sorry i misunderstood the problem. An another problem could be when the chest is destroyed (moved in this case) how would you move it cause once a mod or op place it it becomes private and if you remove the lock their stuff can be stolen.

TarynMai:
I told you that if he didnt remove it the next time he came on then I would. I said it would never be removed only if you kept acting immature.

gavin1928374655:

--- Quote from: awesomealicia on April 20, 2013, 01:56:47 am ---I told you that if he didnt remove it the next time he came on then I would. I said it would never be removed only if you kept acting immature.

--- End quote ---
Thats not what you said. You were saying that I didnt own the land and that he had a right to place the chest there. Sure in this situation it would be removed but the rules still say nothing about placing chests in cleared land. Anyone is still allowed to place a chest like that. Also the two week long waiting period for the chest to be moved if he was inactive is still quite the hinderance to any builds I would have planned.

2468avc:
I definitely agree with gavin. I'm building a large Roman city and temple and I've cleared out a swamp biome, a jungle biome, and part of a desert biome. I really wish that this land was safer than it is, especially because of some glitch where you can glitch out of the little spawn area I made at my /home.


--- Quote from: Nick3306 on April 20, 2013, 01:07:03 am ---You are missing one really important part of your argument. If a players clears a forest and has an active build on it, how are players supposed to know that someone else cleared out the land? Especially if the land is big enough, there would be no way to know. Our current rules were made because we feel it is the best and easiest way to do land.

--- End quote ---

Well, maybe there should be a rule that if there are visible signs in the area claiming the land, and it looks leveled and cleared, then building there is grief?

TarynMai:

--- Quote from: gavin1928374655 on April 20, 2013, 02:13:13 am ---
--- Quote from: awesomealicia on April 20, 2013, 01:56:47 am ---I told you that if he didnt remove it the next time he came on then I would. I said it would never be removed only if you kept acting immature.

--- End quote ---
Thats not what you said. You were saying that I didnt own the land and that he had a right to place the chest there. Sure in this situation it would be removed but the rules still say nothing about placing chests in cleared land. Anyone is still allowed to place a chest like that. Also the two week long waiting period for the chest to be moved if he was inactive is still quite the hinderance to any builds I would have planned.

--- End quote ---
It was two blocks you couldn't touch. I think you'd live.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page