Discussion forum > Suggestions

Ugly Sky structures

<< < (3/4) > >>

Chief149:
Just do what Nhataley said. Either build the giant wall, or get permission to remove the structure or have an OP do it (that is of course only if the owner of the sky structure is perma banned or has left never to return).

iGenerator:
I would be fine if it was suggested that you not build in the sky as it does not seem realistic but people will not enforce it due to feeling bad telling people not to do something that they think is attractive. But meh, on classic it was because of the small world size (512x512) compared to the thousands or blocks of almost infinite amount of land on SMP. When someone would build one of these builds there it would make the area below the build unusable.

Xeadin:
On classic, the term was sky platforms, because people kept on towering up to the sky limit and building little platforms right at the limit, which made them look just as bad as the towers that led up to them.

In SMP, people are building sky cities and adding stuff to them. There are a number of decent sky cities, but I would have to agree that a few of them would be better off built on the ground. However, these are the individual's own decisions, and we are not going to tell them, "you can't do that."

I would prefer to see nicer floating cities, and I'm sure many others are on the same boat, but let people do as they will. A current solution to the dark areas underneath would be to light the area to the best of your ability.

RuthlessTomato:
I have a sky fort with a few friends in the old guest, but everyone living nearby (/cinfo and /seen) is inactive and has been for 6 months +. The area is heavily griefed so the ground is unusable.

Nyssa:
The fact of the matter is, Classic is for building, SMP is for surviving it isn't now nor has it ever been a creative server. People can build nice things if they want, but it's not a requirement.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page