Discussion forum > Suggestions

Reform for top_voter rewards

<< < (11/11)

Wyboth:
Well, that is true. I guess my point is that it won't motivate them any further.

cschurz:

--- Quote from: mcoon1 on December 20, 2012, 05:25:57 am ---That is good and all... but I think that we need to look beyond what the "ultra-dedicated" few want and look to what would be better for the server. As they stand, the "Top_Voter" rewards are great, but they really only affect ~15 people. I am proposing reform that would encourage a person who may have 1/2 of the votes of the number one voter (which is still an impressive contribution) to continue to vote as often as they can.

I know that the current system is fun... but think about how many people it actually encourages to vote. The top 10? 15? A raffle would encourage EVERYONE to vote as often as they can. The way I see it, when it really comes down to it, a raffle would be a MUCH better use of the resources that are currently being expended in an effort to encourage voting.

--- End quote ---


--- Quote ---..So, does anyone have any input on TOP_VOTER reform (not normal voter rewards involving diamonds)? Any possible flaws with having a raffle at the end of the month?

--- End quote ---

i think your original suggestion is confused; is your goal to open the "top voter" rank up to more people as encouragement to vote, or is your goal to simply increase voting overall?

i've already said:


--- Quote ---i wouldn't call top voter an incentive, i would call it a reward to those who are dedicated.

--- End quote ---

which i still believe (read: turning it into a raffle defeats the purpose). that is why my post tried to shift the topic into reforming the actual vote reward rather than reforming "top voter" - because it sounds like all you want is to have more incentive to vote, and changing top voter isn't going to happen.

Nhataley:
Well I got a suggestion.

People always talk in global chat saying "I'm sooo poor! Please give me money"

And that is ingame money. Most people sell diamonds at $50 In-Game.

So why not just give the player 50 In-Game money instead of diamonds?

Wyboth:

--- Quote from: Nhataley on December 20, 2012, 04:30:15 pm ---Well I got a suggestion.

People always talk in global chat saying "I'm sooo poor! Please give me money"

And that is ingame money. Most people sell diamonds at $50 In-Game.

So why not just give the player 50 In-Game money instead of diamonds?

--- End quote ---
Diamonds are also good for making tools, and I think most people would rather get 5 free each day instead of paying $750 for one.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version