Discussion forum > Server News
New guest world announcement!
Drunz:
--- Quote from: SalsaInABowl on December 21, 2012, 02:28:58 am ---Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.
--- End quote ---
Not to be rude but Snipe, weren't you one of the ones whining about the same thing?
SalsaInABowl:
--- Quote from: Drunz on December 22, 2012, 02:20:44 am ---
--- Quote from: SalsaInABowl on December 21, 2012, 02:28:58 am ---Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.
--- End quote ---
Not to be rude but Snipe, weren't you one of the ones whining about the same thing?
--- End quote ---
I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about how people still think the world was being deleted.
clawstrider:
--- Quote from: NotABronie on December 20, 2012, 01:58:14 am ---Please excuse the poor chronology, but what do you mean by "steal builds"
--- End quote ---
Yeah, sonic understood.
--- Quote from: Mr_Mr_Mr on December 16, 2012, 09:46:34 pm ---There is something you missed. You can cheat and find diamonds in the world and dig them up on the server.
If the world is removed, then they'll most likely put it up for download, like they did with the 1.8 world.
--- End quote ---
I already agreed that if a world is in use, it should not be put up for download. I was talking in reply to DK.
--- Quote from: xDeeKay on December 17, 2012, 04:49:48 am ---Claw, what are you talking about? We already know the pros and cons to it..
But have you not been reading anything here? No world is being deleted, so no world is being released.
Also, why did you quote me on that? It's got nothing to do with what I said.
--- End quote ---
You claimed that the 1.7 world being put up for download (After the world had been deleted) was "A mistake by Optical, it wasn't intentional.".
This world had already been deleted, after he put it up for download. I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about.
If you had read my quote, I agreed that after it is deleted (Are you saying that no worlds will ever be deleted ever again?) it should be put up for download.
Maybe my original post was a little hard to understand, but it was mostly in reply to:
--- Quote from: _-_Ben_-_ on December 16, 2012, 08:48:55 am ---Nick,
could you put the world for a free download on the fourms ( just before it gets put in)?
that would be great because ALOT of people would like a copy
--- End quote ---
saying that ONLY after a world is deleted, should it be put up for download. The thing that seemed to confuse most people was not reading:
--- Quote from: clawstrider on December 16, 2012, 09:20:09 pm ---May I ask why worlds that are not being used by the server should not be up for download?
--- End quote ---
The not bit. I was agreeing with you guys, not quite sure why it started this.
CookieMaster:
:D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version