Discussion forum > Suggestions

Votekicking

(1/2) > >>

High Roller:
I think it would be a good decision to have votekicking on the server. However:

1. Votekicking would only become enabled once there are no staff members online.

2. Only Trusteds could start the votekicking.

It would be a great way to do give warning kicks to people that think they are being sneaky by breaking the rules. Also a record of these kicks would show on a players history to aid staff members in decisions for things like banning.

Tell me what you guys think,
High Roller

LordoftheBlock:
I think this could be a positive outcome. I've been on many times before, where staff are not on, and people start to seriously spam the chat, or in other cases, people yelling grief in chat and no one can help. The only disadvantage I could think of would be, some Trusteds might abuse the power, and somehow use it to troll or something. If I recall, I believe we used to have something like a request ban and kick, where you could request a ban or kick of someone by typing a command or something. Now, I'm certainly not on board with the whole "Trusteds should get more abilities" bid, but I think this could be useful, if implemented and used correctly.

joshskiizz:
I agree, John. I feel like this is giving power to Trusteds if it is passed. It's uncommon for the server to have at least not one staff member on. Plus, as I have experienced by watching a group of friends kick someone out of a game on other games for not fitting the requirement or some other irrelevant reason, Trusteds may abuse this. I'm not saying every Trusted would become corrupt and power hungry but, it can have a bad outcome.

High Roller:
True

raul7legend:
I've seen this on different games on server, it's horrendous.

Not to say that I think that trusted will abuse it but the power to kick should be in the hands of the staff members only.
People that are trusted means that they have trust from the staff members, nothing else.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page