Discussion forum > Suggestions

Expiring Protection Stones

<< < (5/5)

ViperZeroOne:
Fadmad:  Yea, I did notice, but if I replied "Spamarian" it would look weird to people who don't know.  *LOL*


I'd say that if a player had a massive structure and was offline for over 2 months, he no longer has ownership of that structure.  Why should things be preserved forever if the player doesn't care to return?  When would it be safe to say, "Clear the land for an active player"?  I think 2 months is more than enough time for someone to simply log in.

Fadmad:
Good reply, but I still believe that this should only be implemented on coal ore not lapis or diamond.

ViperZeroOne:
Maybe so, but just because you place a lapis or diamond block don't think a mod won't remove it if you aren't online for 2+ months and a player goes "Can I build here?"...  That much inactivity tells us there is probably a 95% chance you won't be coming back, and you're structures are just taking up space. 

Especially with the "farm" example.  People might treasure their melon/pumpkin farms and think just because they're massive that they're something special.  Personally I think they're more of an eyesore than anything else.  Everyone has one, because that's the best way to make money, so there isn't really anything special about them.  I have yet to see a melon farm that's impressed me.  It's just a big block and the inside is a very small redstone component that's been replicated about a billion times.  No real talent required, no imagination, it's just a farm.   I say if you're offline for 2 months and someone wants to rip it down to build something unique and creative (even if the farm is huge) my vote is for ripping it down.

Fadmad:
So can somebody rip apart all the building around my house? Oololol (not joking)

ViperZeroOne:

--- Quote from: Fadmad on May 26, 2012, 02:21:03 pm ---So can somebody rip apart all the building around my house? Oololol (not joking)

--- End quote ---

Have someone check it out.  You would be surprised.  =P

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version